No Big Deal- Noach 5778

It happened on January 10th, 2012, at a concert of the New York Philharmonic. The Philharmonic was playing Gustav Mahler’s Ninth Symphony, an intensely stormy piece that contains, in its last few moments, peaceful, quiet, even otherworldly music. Considered by many scholars as having been written by Mahler with his own mortality in mind, these final moments are almost as though the composer is accepting and even embracing his death with peace and equanimity. It was at this moment, as the orchestra was playing these ethereal notes, that someone’s phone went off, playing the iPhone marimba tune. Normally, when things like this happen, the orchestra continues playing, but this time, conductor Alan Gilbert stopped the orchestra and turned around. Audience members pointed at a couple in the front row who may have been the source of the disturbance, so he asked them to turn off the phone. Still, the ringing persisted, with the couple in question staring back at Maestro Gilbert intently. The crowd was going wild; people were screaming- “Thousand Dollar Fine!” “Kick him out!” A blogger who was present described the audience as wanting blood. Finally, someone put his hands in his pocket, and the phone was silenced.

In describing the proximal causes of the devastating flood that forms the central narrative of this week’s Torah reading, our sages are emphatic. The Talmud tells us

“לא נחתם גזר דינם אלא על הגזל”,

The action that sealed their fate was theft. And not just any kind of theft. The Torah says that the world was awash in חמס, a kind of theft the Medrash describes as petty larceny:

חמס אינו שוה פרוטה וגזל ששוה פרוטה. וכך היו אנשי המבול עושים: היה אחד מהם מוציא קופתו מליאה תורמוסים, והיה זה בא ונוטל פחות משוה פרוטה, וזה בא ונוטל פחות משוה פרוטה

Chamas refers to theft of an item that is not worth much at all, less than a few cents. A person would leave his house with a basket of fruit, and everyone around him would surreptitiously purloin small amounts of it. Even though each individual only robbed the person of very little, the aggregate effect was to rob him of his entire yield. This is indeed a serious offense, but is that a reason to destroy a world? Is theft on a small scale really enough to sentence the world to utter oblivion?

 

I’d like to suggest a simple lesson from this statement, based on a comment of the Kli Yakar.  

כלי יקר בראשית פרק ו פסוק יא

 

(יא) ותשחת הארץ לפני אלהים וגו’. אלהים היינו הדיינים כי היו גוזלים פחות משוה פרוטה שאין מוציאין בדיינין ועיני הדיין רואות ואין לאל ידו להציל דמעות העשוקים לכך נאמר לפני האלהים, לפניהם ממש

 

What was so egregious about these actions was not that people were stealing small amounts. It was, rather, the very fact that these amounts fell below even the threshold of a small claims court. The victims were not only violated, but they had no recourse to redress their grievance. In these acts of theft, people were robbing one another not just of small items, but of intangibles, of those essential ingredients to a stable life.  Losing those items doesn’t alter the net worth of the victim, but may change people irrevocably, robbing them of  a sense of security and their ability to trust others. And the worst part was that it was socially acceptable; because none of these feelings have any monetary value, they are easily rationalized, callously ignored and flagrantly violated. Indeed, the theft that precipitated these traumatic feelings was viewed as perfectly normal; if someone were to chastise the thief for his actions, he would respond, “Lighten up! Everyone does it- it’s all in good fun!” as if the victim should be silent or the upstander should just look the other way. There was no awareness of the pain these actions were causing others, and if there was, there was no sense that it was anything actionable or worthy of change. That is why the #metoo campaign that has exploded this week has resonated so strongly- I know it has with me, as a man, as a husband, as a father (of boys) and as a Rabbi. Honorable men who strive to treat women with respect and dignity had no idea of the degree to which the women in their lives are subjected to constant unwanted attention of all kinds, often in ways that take nothing of monetary value but leave the recipient feeling completely violated- behavior that is enshrined in a corrosive and misogynistic male culture in which these offenses are not considered a “big deal.”

 

When we broaden the definition of  חמס or  “intangible theft,” we can readily see the slippery slope that leads to a society’s corruption. There are many ways in which we steal pachot meshava perutah, and which we rationalize as “no big deal.”   Oscar Wilde famously observed that a cynic is a person who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing.  In a broader sense the cynic is the one who steals from others that which is special, but has no price tag. The Shem MiShmuel often speaks of three levels of kedusha which permeate virtually every arena in Jewish thought: מקום זמן ונפש.  There are three areas in which we deal with intangibles, which demand reverence, and yet are vulnerable to cynical profanation: Place, Time, and Person.  

 

Consider place. Picture the scene: You are at a wedding; it is the holiest moment in the life of a couple as they stand under the chuppah. Perhaps it has been long in coming, too, a couple who has spent years looking for their bashert. And as the groom gets ready to shatter the glass in a symbolic act of mourning and severity- an act described by the Talmud as a drastic act designed to halt excessive levity- you turn to your Chuppah buddy, the one you sit next to at every wedding, and whip out the tired cliche we always think we are the first to utter- “that’s the last time he’s putting his foot down!” Much like the phone that goes off in the middle of a transcendent piece of music, that sacred moment can never be reclaimed. Or we try and tell a funny story at a shiva house, when the atmosphere becomes too heavy, even though a sense of gravitas is exactly what a shiva house calls for. We are uncomfortable with moments of intense emotion and extreme holiness, so we rob others of feeling them when we make jocular remarks to lighten the mood.

 

Or consider the way we rob people of time. On a most basic level, we do this when we are late. I freely admit that I struggle with punctuality, and when I am late, I will sometimes rationalize that “it’s no big deal.” And often, it isn’t. But when you are late, you are showing another person that you consider your time more valuable than theirs, or that you consider their time not to be valuable at all. But it’s not just robbing people of a few minutes of their day, that they will never recover. Sometimes, we rob people of their memories of a special time.  Twenty two ago, my first cousin in Israel  his bar mitzvah. All of his cousins on all sides came together from all over to a hotel in Israel for Shabbos, and it was an unforgettable weekend. One of the reasons it was so remarkable was that my grandmother and all eight of her siblings were there as well. It was the first time they were all together at an event, possibly in decades, even they all grew up in Israel and almost all of them still lived there. It was also unforgettable, at least retroactively, because it was proved to be the last time they were together: one of my grandmother’s younger brothers succumbed several months later to the leukemia he was suffering. Everyone laughed, sang and told stories, which was amazing because- as is common in the Yerushalmi family my grandmother came from- both prior and subsequent to this weekend, several of my grandmother’s siblings were usually fighting and often not on speaking terms. But everyone behaved that weekend, and all we remember were the happy moments. A family reunion plagued by petty arguments undermines the weekend, but more upsetting is that the argument can mean that the memory of the gathering has been irreparably sullied, leaving nothing but a bitter aftertaste. Of course, we rationalize- she started it, it’s not a big deal, we made up afterwards, it was all in good fun. But we have no idea how much these memories mean to the elderly, to the family matriarch who has been looking forward to this for  months.  For the family members who may not see everyone together again in this life, or the grandchild who is meeting everyone for the first time, that tarnished experience will linger for a long time.  

 

Finally, we rob people of their nefesh, of their soul and their sense of self. How many times have we been at a Shabbos meal where a husband or a wife makes a callous and deeply insensitive remark at the expense of his or her spouse? Maybe the husband makes fun of his wife’s spending habits, jokes he thinks are innocent about the way she spends “his” money at the mall. I’m sure the husband loves his wife, and if he were pressed on it, he would say “It’s no big deal! She thinks it’s funny!” Is it any wonder men treat women awfully later in life- is it any wonder that there have been countless #metoos- if, when they should be learning to be mentches, young men are instead taught that treating women like this is “no big deal”? This kind of remark can be easily brushed off, but can rob the victim of his or her dignity and sense of self in just one or two short sentences. And we rob our children, too, of intangibles in millions of ways that are not classically abusive. When we talk about the personal lives of others in their presence, we rob them of their refinement. When we initiate contentious political discussions in their presence, we rob them of the sensitivity needed to see when something is painful for others to talk about.  When we let them watch movies with violence and other mature content, we rob them of their innocence. And nefesh, a person’s sense of self, is not just their personal dignity but their beliefs as well. When we make cynical remarks about religion, or the way others practice it- someone takes on a chumrah in earnest devotion and we think it is misguided, someone is seeking an avenue of spirituality we think is silly or someone espouses a hashkafic view we find too conservative or too liberal, or we express our views about organized religion and its practitioners- we have no idea who is listening when we express our views. Maybe someone is listening who is struggling with emunah, and instead of learning more and seeking inspiration, they will now take the path of cynicism and apathy instead.

 

When all of our most sacred realms, place, time and soul are threatened by petty theft and cowardly rationalization, we need to double our efforts to reinforce the honor which has been damaged.  We need to tell the world why it truly is an extremely “big deal”. The antidote is reestablish value where it was previously undetected- to honor the time, the space, the sense of self and the belief of others is to give the respect that is so sorely lacking today. Noach had a daunting task before him- to rebuild a world from scratch, to teach a new generation what to value, and what their values should be. May we succeed at doing the same.

 

Many thanks to Rabbi Shaanan Gelman for his partnership.

 

© 2017 Rabbi Ariel Rackovsky

 

Nudge- Bereishis 5778

A collaboration with my dear friend Rabbi Shaanan Gelman of Kehillat Chovevei Tzion of Skokie, Illinois.

As we bid farewell to the season of Chaggim, there is still one feature of this blessed time of year that may yet linger. Between honey cake and kreplach, stuffed cabbage and Texas Kosher BBQ from our epic Simchas Beis Hashoeva, even as Yom Tov is in the rear view mirror, many of us are still experiencing the aftereffects of indigestion. As we reach into our medicine cabinets to find relief, many of us will instinctively  grab not one, but two tablets of Alka Seltzer. There is no reason for this at all; one tablet usually does the trick, but they come in convenient packets of two. Believe it or not, this is the result of an elaborate mind game of which we are all victims,  from the devious and brilliant advertisers at a firm called Jack Tinker and Partners. You see, Alkaseltzer’s sales were plummeting, as it was widely perceived to be primarily a geriatric curative. After several failed attempts to market it to a younger population, they realized that the key was not rebranding it for a different crowd, but getting their base to buy double. What is fascinating about this is that if we can understand how they succeeded, we can understand another decision which has plagued humanity since creation, also involving an act of unfortunate consumption: Adam HaRishon’s decision to taste the forbidden fruit of the Tree of Knowledge.

 

What was Adam thinking? He had a clear directive: You can eat from literally any tree in the Garden of Eden but one- and he knew which one it was! Yet Adam makes a beeline for the one item that was prohibited to him. We can readily understand why Chava chose to taste the עץ הדעת, in fact, it is more or less spelled out in the Torah, and elaborated upon by Rashi.

בראשית פרק ג

(ו) ותרא האשה כי טוב העץ למאכל וכי תאוה הוא לעינים ונחמד העץ להשכיל

 

As Rashi explains the process of the serpent’s seduction:

רש”י בראשית פרק ג

) ותרא האשה – ראתה דבריו של נחש והנאו לה והאמינתו:

She perceived his words, they gave her pleasure, and she believed him. Yes, Chava pushed back against the snake, pointing out that God had specifically instructed them not to eat from the fruit, but the snake was ready for her reticence. It’s not hard to imagine how easily she was induced to violate God’s directive, because the snake was validating her basic, primal urges.  But it is Adam’s reaction that is inexplicable, for there is no recorded dialogue anywhere in which Chava sweet-talked him into eating the fruit. All the Torah tells us is that she gave it to him and he ate it, with no questions asked and no resistance offered. How could he not put up a fight?

 

The Ohr HaChaim offers a profound insight, in the context of Adam’s explanation when confronted with his misdeeds. When asked how he could eat from the tree when he was explicitly prohibited from doing so, he offered the first ever iteration of what has become a tired cliche. “The woman you placed with me- she made me do it.” Committing an offense and then making the woman take the fall- that is the outdated  philosophy of the House of Tudor, the 1960s boardroom and, apparently, the 21st century film mogul. The Ohr HaChaim, however,  suggests that this answer is eminently reasonable! Adam was placed in the Garden of Eden, a never ending smorgasbord of earthly and spiritual delights. Whatever was in it, Adam thought, was pure and holy, a concentrated manifestation of the will of God- otherwise God would not have delivered it to his doorstep- whether it was the woman who God gave as his companion or the fruit she had proffered. The Ohr HaChaim goes as far as to say that Adam had no idea that what he was given was the fruit of the forbidden tree and had no reason to suspect it violated God’s directive! So if this is a reasonable excuse, he was a shogeig, an unwitting sinner, and should not have been held liable!

 

In light of this Ohr HaChaim, Rabbi Dr. Norman Lamm offered a profound explanation in a sermon delivered in 1963.

If a man really cares about something, if he is involved deeply, if he is totally committed, if he is really concerned, then he will bother to check and investigate and re-investigate. But if his commitment is only superficial, if all his concern is only a surface gesture, then he will be satisfied to live his life as he wills without bothering to make any investigation. The tragedy and the crime is that Adam did not take God seriously….[he] was too busy enjoying his paradise to worry about God’s  commandment. And so he satisfied himself with the fact that as long as he does not, with total awareness, clearly and directly violate the divine will, he is on the safe side…

Yes, Adam knew God had forbidden the fruit of the garden, but in his mind, what he was doing was no violation of that directive. Adam was not careful enough and assumed that whatever passed before him was not only not contraband, but in accordance with God’s desire. As long as Adam was in the Garden of Eden, he thought everything he did was Edenic-God reminded him that  him that is not so.  To be a proper servant of God means to be more discerning, to not accept without question everything that appears in your radar.

 

Why did Adam assume this? It is because, from the dawn of humanity, the fatal flaw that affects each of us is that we are highly susceptible to the power of suggestion. Two days ago, Professor Richard H. Thaler of the University of Chicago won the Nobel Prize for his pioneering work in behavioral science and its economic significance.  In his groundbreaking volume “Nudge”, Thaler makes the case that the greatest motivator for people’s behavior is not their own self-interests nor are they governed by economic theory, rather, the single greatest predictor of human economic behavior are the environmental influences that surround them.  It’s the subtle and sometimes blunt  suggestions from our peers, our community and our social network at large that guide the vast majority of our choices. Do you know why you reach for two Alkaseltzer tabs as opposed to one? Because a marketing whiz named Paul Margulies- (famous later in life as the father of the actress Julianna) wrote a jingle: “Plop, Plop, fizz, fizz…Oh What a relief it is…”  the ad featured an animation of two Alka-Seltzers dropping into a crystal glass of water.  The emphasis on the double dose of  “two Alka-Seltzers” dropping into the glass, plus the double language of the jingle, triggered a behavior  pattern in consumers who were convinced that they now needed two tablets to achieve the salutary effect of the antacid. Nothing had changed, except for a small suggestion, yet profits had doubled overnight. Maybe Adam HaRishon was no different than your typical Jew with antacid after a series of three-day Yamim Tovim. Perhaps he was just as susceptible to the suggestion his wife had made. He was willing to give up everything, literally paradise lost.  And for what? Not for any kind of deep urge, but because of the power of a nudge, the need for social acceptance- the voice telling him it was OK- he could have just a bite.

 

Of course, we’d like to believe that we would fare better than Adam did.  If we had the chance to spend 24 hours in Gan Eden, we would not fall apart so easily. But is that self confidence warranted? A study  released last week by Nishma Research  focussing on trends within the Modern Orthodox community presents some disturbing findings. For instance, among the younger population surveyed, it seems Modern Orthodox Jews, as a whole, are less likely to have a significant connection to Israel. Despite the universal encouragement to spend a year in Israel, despite our singing the Tefillah for the State of Israel, despite our celebration of Yom Haatzmaut- our children’s generation is  not enamored with the Jewish homeland. And while the study found that, overall, 90% of Modern Orthodox Jews keep some form of Shabbos and adhere to some kind of kashrus framework, Modern Orthodox Jews are less observant of taharat ha’mishpacha, at 58% of married couples, and fewer men are donning tefillin on a daily basis, at 62% overall and 56% among men ages 18 to 44. And finally, while people feel comfortable in shul, our experience shows that being in shul and being at davening are not at all the same thing. Fewer than half (42%) agree fully that the tefillah experience is meaningful to them. These are only a few of the disturbing findings regarding the religious trends of those who affiliate with our community. To summarize these findings – The #1 reason, by a wide margin, that people identify as Orthodox is the sense of community and belonging. To be sure, there is nothing wrong and everything right about a strong sense of community, and we need to make certain that our community is a warm and loving place for all, no matter where they are in their religious journey. But remember that just being a part of a community is not a seal of approval for all that happens in it, and it is not a panacea against all harmful influences. Someone I know may be holding a fruit, but that does not mean I should take it. Everything we should treasure – tefila, talmud Torah, Shabbat…etc… has taken a back-seat to social Judaism, and it is our job to reclaim for Modern Orthodoxy the core tenets and practices of our community.  Alas, Richard Thaler is not only a prophetic voice for the world of economics; he is also a cautionary voice about what can become of our little Eden if all we do is respond to that nudge without even questioning or caring whether it is what God wants. Our response must therefore be to become more sophisticated in our Judaism, to become more learned and to find ways to make irresistible these aspects that otherwise fall by the wayside. If no one understands the davening, we ought to emphasize biur hatefila.  If the mikveh is going out of style, then we need to ask why.  If our teenagers aren’t wearing tzizis or wearing Tefillin on their days off from school, and if those Tefillin gather dust in the drawer starting the moment high school is over, and if our adults are not providing a good role model for any of this- then perhaps we can look to  incentivize and make irresistible these practices. There is no one right answer for how to do this, but we don’t have the luxury of ignoring it, either. What better time of year than now, as we begin the Torah again, than to rededicate ourselves to this lofty and essential goal. May God grant us success.